Science is the utmost value of mankind. Wisely exploited, is the key to welfare, health, more and more care about natural environment and better understanding of nature. Nevertheless, the present website is devoted first of all to science in the meaning of physics because physics is a fundamental factor in studying surrounding reality. It might seem that science in such understanding is crystal-clear because it lies in rational explanation of natural phenomena. Unfortunately, reality by means of unreliable scientists and applied procedures wander away from our understanding it in a proper way. And this is because:
Only scientists have exclusivity for scientific works. And the point is not that everyone could prate scientifically in one’s understanding, but in this, that useful and rational ideas should be evaluated automatically and obligatorily, without asking about education and connections with scientific circles of the researcher, who has something to say in the sphere of his interest.
The image of science is shaped by so-called mainstream (often mainsewage as it turns out) physicists. Some of them managed to smuggle to science myths that are functioning till the present day unhampered.
Media don’t touch anything that hasn’t got imprimatur of mainstream science. On the other hand, such a scientist can publish the biggest blunders, which are treated fully seriously.
Even the most revealing achievements of non-scientists have a rather hard chance of noticing them.
Discussions with researchers, non-scientists, are rather shunned when they are becoming inconvenient and disavow falsehood. Discussions usually take place on forums as in them scientists are due to respond in somewhat of obligation.
There is a wrongly understood solidarity of scientists, consisting on ignoring of non-scientists.
There comes to propagation of irrational ideas admitted by mainstream scientists. And those who oppose it, are not treated seriously.
There is too much of mathematics in physics in spite that the first does not explain anything but just describes.
Science should define the notions that it uses.
To sum up: There is a lack of any independent, superior institution, performing control and care over the rationality of researches. It is inadmissible in this day and age of common access to science and its advantages, that its further development in some sectors was set back by means of propagation of false pieces of information about surrounding reality. The fact that everyone has the right to question scientific hypotheses and theories, and is free to publish his own works and „works” doesn’t change the fact that independent researchers or scientists opposing the admitted by science myths, have no influence on removing of nonsenses which have become naturalized in physics for over one hundred years. These things are pivotal for proper comprehension and description of nature and its ruling laws. It must not be belittled!
Furthermore, there is still squandered money for unnecessary investigations. I am not saying that LHC is needless. On the contrary, it can provide answers to many questions, but it’s enough a bit of reflection in order to find that searching for the Higgs particle was a waste of time. It’s simply nonsense. I have answered to myself a couple of questions and have complete clarity in the subject of mass. Thus the drawn conclusion is: Higgs particle doesn’t exist, nor existed ever (similarly as gravitons don’t exist). At the same time, I’d like to stress that I don’t want to be perceived as showing my slighting attitude towards scientists or non-appreciation of their great importance in science. I feel great respect of their wide knowledge which I am short of as I am not educated in physics. It is neither a will of showing off and playing wise on my part. I am writing about these things because I am keen on this subject. If somebody considers that I am writing rubbish, then can discuss this with me, or simply leave my website.
And that’s all for the time being