Gravity – how to understand it?

To answer this question, I adopted couple of pivotal assumptions, without which I wouldn’t trouble myself to explain my stance in terms of cosmology.
1. The universe is a closed system (finite), limited by lack of space “beyond” it.
2. The universe is not expanding.
3. Prematerial state of the universe contained only primordial, homogeneous ether, the building block of all forms of matter.
To provide some sense on gravity issue, you should have a reasonable scenario as a whole, and that means that everything must seamlessly interact with each other – must logically be explainable and do not violate the known laws of nature. Thus explanation of functioning of the universe requires re-introduction of ether (i.e. primordial, globular homogeneous physical entities without inner structure, of magnitude far beyond Planck length). Without it, all the speculations and researches are in vain. In addition, by means of ether there could be explained a dual character of light which in the medium of ether causes its disturbance manifested by forming and accompanying it wave. Ether was widely considered to be motionless physical entity. I do not agree with it for the obvious reason. Now, if we liken ether to the motionless dense fog, its state could be disturbed by entering into it a vehicle. Thus, by analogy comes to conclude that the movement of the ether present in the nucleus of the universe, radius of which amounts around 4.6*10^10 l.y. is resultant. What’s more, ether in the vicinity of astronomical objects is converted into a magnetic field, weakening as it moves away from them, because any form of matter acts like magnet. It’s due to rotational motion of objects like planets or galaxies and their inner structure like atoms.
There is no difference in anatomy (lack of inner structure) between ether (its single component I dubbed „premagnetic”) and magnetic field (its single component I called „magnetin”).

Ether or pre-matter (far beyond Plack length)

However, what differentiates them is their movement, changing its behaviour. In case of ether in interstellar space resultant motion, and in the case of magnetic field of the same ether, orderly motion caused by rotating astronomical objects, rotation of particles and obviously (imperceptible) motion of ether beyond universal nucleus because of its rotation (the universal nucleus rotates – according to my conjectures). Taking into account the universal nucleus as a whole, its complement constitutes only the „pure” ether, devoid of cosmic background radiation. Such an idea implies occurrence of two opposing forces: of the universal nucleus and ether. Thus seeking trials in the vast space of the universe of the so-called dark matter is nothing else but a search for the causative factor of gravity, or ether, existence of which is notoriously declined. And what about dark energy? – one may ask. Pure energy does not occur in nature as a spontaneous physical entity. Now, if we assume the existence of ether, we would automatically have the first component of gravity. The reason is that if we acknowledge the existence of primordial ether, then thereby it can be considered as the causative factor of the creation of matter as out of nothing, nothing can arise (similarly as something cannot turn to nothing). In a word, it is the same thing that could equally well be baptized as prematter. The radius of the finite universe that I calculated (because only finite is possible as in nature infinities don’t occur) amounts to minimum 6.2*10^117 l.y. Although its vastness in comparison with the smallest physical „speck” is a scale which cannot be compared with anything else, before the birth of matter was just ether. It was a prematerial state of nature. This condition was characterized by absence of any other physical entities in addition to said primordial homogeneous ether, which by its (homogeneous) form could „produce” gravity. This can be understood in such a way, that in ether alone gravity did not occur as it formed oneness (one “organism”). One might ask a question what was the essential difference between the prematerial universe and material one? Thus, in the first one gravity was not existent, in the latter is, thus the matter is the second component of gravity. But the universe itself as it was, still is of the same magnitude. This means that it contains the same material (building block of all forms of matter) as originally, but some portion of it was transformed to a high degree of complexity of forms because of accidental disturbance in the uniform distribution of ether at some place in the universe. Nevertheless, the said disturbance initiated rotational motion in the universe. Such a transformation of ether into matter continued until its bound quantity equalized quantity of its primordial form. The first more complex objects that were formed were clouds of hydrogen, which gave rise to the further evolution of matter. After the re-introduction of ether (which could be named prematter as well), there follow two essential things, that are necessary to understand the mechanism of the gravity.
I. Firstly, you need to take into account these places in the universe, which constitute a perfect insulation.
Such places are:
1. Free spaces between the spherical components of the ether. They must be such, otherwise the universe would be united in one mass. Besides, there is a limit, end of which is the smallest form of physical entity, which is the ether .
2. Another such place is confines of the universe. Thus the second insulator is a place „outside” the universe, constituting lack of space. This is a limitation which does not allow any physical entity to get out „outside” the universe.
As far as the second delimiter is obvious, the void space is not understood clearly. Well, there is a perfect vacuum in the universe. It is between premagnetics, or the ether constituent units (whose understanding is generally ascribed to the whole). Nevertheless, these empty spaces do not play role as an insulator of interactions of physical entities. The reason is that all forms of matter (created from ether) are of magnitude larger than empty spaces despite they are present in them too. Thus, if there were a perfect vacuum areas partitioning physical entities, they would constitute places where there were no interaction between any of the forms of matter on opposite sides of the septum. I would like to call attention to the fact that space is also to some extent the insulator (like dry air to a certain limit), nevertheless, by means of ether vacuum is a conductor which allows interactions between all physical entities of the universe.
II. Secondly, the next essential thing is mutual contact of all forms of matter, which is secured by ether (or prematter).
Physical entities „sense” each other. This sensing can be illustrated by attraction and repulsion of magnets. They attract themselves by uniting their streams of ejecting ether – known in physics as magnetic field – because it’s “easier” to unite their streams of ether than to eject them to the space which is resistant (to some extant). They repel because it’s “easier” to throw away ether into space, than overcome resistance of the streams of each other, which is impossible without changing of poles.
The same principle applies to gravity. Something must have physical contact with something that the pulling could occur. But in nature such physical contact is cleverly disguised by „empty space”. And that’s the reason for not recognizing this direct pull. And how this is technically performed, can be illustrated as follows:
Magnetism, electricity and gravitation have one common feature, which is motion of ether and matter. Science, unfortunately, has no insight into subtleties of nature, thus I cannot provide any details of precise description of these phenomena. So, my intuitive explanation has to be general. It’s obvious thing, that all forms of matter are in a constant motion and strength of magnetic field depends (among other things) on rotational velocity of bodies. Any object on the one hand absorbs ether and on the other hand ejects it. The faster the body spins the faster ether flows through it and around it.
The cosmic medium, or ether, has its braking properties too. On the other hand we know that all physical phenomena proceed choosing the least resistance. In case of attraction of bodies, that are rotating in the same direction, they obviously „choose” the „easiest” way, which means that its „easier” to unite their streams of ether / electrons, than to eject them into space, because otherwise it would create its resistance. Analogically happens in case of repulsion. The two bodies (rotating in the opposite direction) „prefer” to eject ether / electrons into space (the easiest way) thus they have to repel each other to achieve it. That means space turns out more „comfortable” for them, than „keeping together” when reversal of poles, in other words directions of spins, is impossible. Magnets have the same preferences. In case of gravity, the universal nucleus opposes masses of the universal ether. In this case there is no choice of taking easier way by any of them. To illustrate it, imagine a balloon in a weightlessness environment (closed, so the circulating air will not inflate or deflate it) filled with air. In the middle of the balloon is placed a vacuum cleaner. When actuated, it will suck the air from one side and on the other throw it away. It will obviously cause its rotation. The same is true in the closed system of the universe. It’s just that this „vacuum cleaner” or nucleus of the universe pulls ether from all sides and simultaneously ether pulls matter, as action causes counteraction. Summing up, the universal nucleus (containing all forms of matter) must rotate as a whole, thus have its axis. However, its rotation must be so slow that practically imperceptible, thus it’s the reason of such a weak gravity. So, mechanism of gravity consists in rotating universal nucleus in the vast ocean of ether. In this case ether is absorbed by the cluster of the universal nucleus and at the same time ejected. This results in stretching of galaxies by masses of rotating ether. The biggest pull (stretching force) of ether are experiencing those galaxies that are at the outskirts of the universal nucleus.
It seems very likely that the universal nucleus (assuming there are no farther astronomical objects beyond our observational reach) has its axis, poles and rotates (very slowly – proportionally to the gravitational force) but such good premises that could possibly determine it are:
– The poles and axis of the universal nucleus, let’s name it N – S, should be sought between opposed great voids
– The equator should be sought where the filament galaxies stretch in the same plane as equator. In other words parallel to the sought equator
– Some irregularities could be explained that the universal nucleus has performed merely couple of rotations since creation of matter (some 14 billion years ago if properly calculated).
– Taking the above circumstances into account, the universal nucleus should resemble a sphere flattened at the poles.
In a word, gravity is forced by gyration of matter. If the universe was not a closed system (limited by lack of space „beyond” it), I would not trouble to explain the phenomenon of gravity.

Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Hello, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues.

    When I look at your website in Firefox, it looks fine
    but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.
    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, wonderful blog!

  2. Hi there everyone, it’s my first go to see at this site, and paragraph is really fruitful designed for me,
    keep up posting such content.

  3. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I truly appreciate your efforts and I will be waiting for your next write ups thanks once again.

  4. A person essentially assist to make critically articles I might state.
    That is the first time I frequented your website page
    and thus far? I amazed with the research you made to create this
    actual post incredible. Wonderful job!

  5. Excellent post however I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this subject?
    I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate
    a little bit further. Thanks!

  6. Hey! I know this is kinda off topic but I’d figured I’d ask.
    Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest
    authoring a blog post or vice-versa? My blog goes over a lot of the same subjects as yours and I feel we could greatly benefit from each other.
    If you are interested feel free to shoot me an e-mail. I look
    forward to hearing from you! Great blog by the

  7. Make sure you read any content you obtain from their website to make sure it’s not just keywords and
    crap. It is important that you simply spend some time
    to find out how each of these work, and how they are often integrated
    in your advantage. 10 Google reader produce an RSS
    feed of your website and blogsite and you are going
    to be amazed at the number of individuals will follow everything you need to say.

  8. Have you ever thought about writing an ebook or guest authoring on other blogs?
    I have a blog based on the same subjects you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my audience would appreciate your work.
    If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.

  9. Great blog you’ve got here.. It’s hard to find excellent
    writing like yours nowadays. I honestly appreciate individuals like you!
    Take care!!

  10. Hmm it seems like your website ate my first comment (it was
    extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
    I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still
    new to everything. Do you have any suggestions for
    novice blog writers? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  11. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any issues of
    plagorism or copyright infringement? My blog has a lot of
    exclusive content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of
    it is popping it up all over the internet without my
    authorization. Do you know any techniques to help protect against content
    from being stolen? I’d really appreciate it.

  12. Yes! Finally something about break down services.

  13. You did everything „white hat” and then you are finally being rewarded.
    In order to acquire your website on Google
    for your chosen search term, you have to optimize your website.

    How to be successful in Ad – Words can be achieved if you understand well how this ad system
    works, along with the following should be done for fast success.

  14. Right away I am ready to do my breakfast, once having
    my breakfast coming yet again to read additional news.

  15. Heya i am for the primary time here. I came across this board and I in finding It really helpful
    & it helped me out much. I hope to provide something back and help others such as you helped me.

  16. What’s up Dear, are you actually visiting this web page daily,
    if so afterward you will absolutely obtain fastidious experience.

  17. Hey! I know this is kind of off-topic however I needed to ask.

    Does managing a well-established blog such as yours
    require a massive amount work? I am completely new to
    operating a blog however I do write in my journal everyday.

    I’d like to start a blog so I can easily share my own experience and feelings
    online. Please let me know if you have any ideas or tips for brand new aspiring
    bloggers. Appreciate it!

  18. Its like you read my thoughts! You appear to know so
    much approximately this, such as you wrote the book in it or something.
    I feel that you could do with some p.c. to power the message home a bit, however other
    than that, that is magnificent blog. A fantastic read.

    I will certainly be back.

  19. Hello, There’s no doubt that your site could be
    having internet browser compatibility issues. When I take a look at your website in Safari, it looks fine however, when opening in Internet Explorer,
    it’s got some overlapping issues. I merely wanted
    to provide you with a quick heads up! Other than that, great

  20. Hmm is anyone else having problems with the pictures on this blog loading?
    I’m trying to find out if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog.
    Any responses would be greatly appreciated.

  21. Hi there! This article could not be written much better!
    Looking at this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He always kept preaching about this. I most certainly will send this information to him.
    Fairly certain he’ll have a very good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  22. Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News.
    Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there!

  23. I was wondering if you ever considered changing the layout of your
    website? Its very well written; I love what youve got
    to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect
    with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images.

    Maybe you could space it out better?

  24. This is a good tip especially to those fresh to the blogosphere.

    Simple but very accurate info… Many thanks for sharing this one.
    A must read article!

  25. I pay a quick visit daily some web pages and websites to read content, however this webpage offers feature based

  26. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish.
    nonetheless, you command get bought an shakiness over that you wish be delivering
    the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly the
    same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.

  27. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great.
    I do not know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger
    if you are not already 😉 Cheers!

  28. Howdy just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a
    few of the pictures aren’t loading correctly.
    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue.
    I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same outcome.

  29. Hi it’s me, I am also visiting this site regularly,
    this website is really pleasant and the people are actually sharing nice

  30. Hi, this weekend is good for me, since this occasion i am reading this enormous educational post here at my residence.

  31. Hey! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group?
    There’s a lot of people that I think would really appreciate your
    content. Please let me know. Thanks

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

Protected by WP Anti Spam