The Existence in Non-existence Theory on the Universe

Antirelativists of all countries, unite!

Those who claim that understood Relativity, automatly admit that understood nonsense.

No deficiency of knowledge can switch off my brain

By observation no alteration ((!))

Don’t touch time! Time doesn’t tick, only clocks do.

Updating my page I decided to preserve the word ‚theory’ in its title in order it would not be taken for topically another one.

Science, in spite of the huge progress, which has lately been made, still doesn’t give us a sufficiently probable description of the Universe and origin of its material part. In return, we get every now and again new and more complicated theories. Sorely disappointed by this situation, I have decided to apply myself to this problem and not to rest until this mystery is solved. I hope I’ve succeeded to a certain degree. I’d like to stress that I’m not a physicist but an economist. Nevertheless, on the basis of generally available knowledge, I started to brood over this problem, guided by my own way of thinking, and intuition which was a grate help. At the same time I tried to ensure that the final description presented by me would not be in conflict with science. My basic way of thinking was to find the simplest solution. This, which I present beneath, differs considerably from the models of the Universe described by science.

Cosmology needs radical reconstruction because is based on false hypotheses. The false hypotheses gave birth to false theories, and all this mess is caused due to lack of imagination of what time is. Contemporary Cosmology is abundant in myths that became rooted over 100 years ago and is unable to perform a baby’s step forward. Summing up, physics should let Relativity down without any further delay in order to move a step in proper direction. Relativity is based on hypotheses and theories which cannot be considered as laws of physics as long as they remain hypotheses and theories.

The present page is a clipping of information about surrounding the world. It was created with a purpose to disavow scientific myths, constituting false hypotheses, about which I have been discussing on various forums since couple of years and explain them in my simple books „Definition of Time”, ISBN 1844016420 and also ISBN 9781844016426 published in January 2006, „Three Indispensable Steps to the Theory of Everything”, ISBN 9781905399420, October 2009 and „Theory of Everything in Outline”, ISBN 9781780882390, November 2012.

The first confirmation that something was going to happen, had been May 2005 silence, the year of centennial of famous Einstein’s papers. Unfortunately, as far as by now, science doesn’t give a univocal attitude towards supporting or rejecting so-called Relativity, which I consider for the biggest mistake ever in the history of science. Below are my theses:

I. TIME

Surrounding reality cannot properly be described without knowing of what time is. When theories on Relativity were born, imagination of what time was, had been (and happens, that still is) entirely false. Time originated along with the birth of matter. To the false physical hypotheses belong the following ones – and almost all of them are connected with time:

1. Dilation of time

2. Relativity of time

3. Time travel

4. Arrow of time

5. Space-time

6. Time dimension

7. Relativity of space and feasibility of its deformation

8. State of singularity of the universe

In order to formulate hypotheses and theories in connection with time, it was indispensable to describe it somehow, otherwise all endeavours aiming at producing hypotheses as well as theories had to turn out futile. The abstract notion of time, setting aside of course, its colloquial and convenient ambiguities, belongs to the basic ones and there is no possibility to to bring it nearer without using other than synonymous ideas. Time has mixed itself with its ambiguities. To separate it from multi-meaning traps, it was necessary to filter off couple of its ambiguities that are also applied in physics. Amongst them are:

1. time as motion

2. time as measuring, or already measured

3. time as unit of measure

Now it is sufficient to prove that time is nothing else but motion. Proving it we must reject all hypotheses and theories, which were based on false imagination of it, consisting on belief that time is flowing and connected with space. What, therefore, time is? According to my definition: „Time is the motion of anything in relation to anything”. Also: „Time is the motion of any form of matter in relation to any form of matter”. As it appears, time cannot slow down its motion, because time is not a body and spontaneously doesn’t exist. It can be counted according to the admitted model of measurement. Time relating to individual forms of matter can be named „individual” and to the beginning of the universe can be named „initial”. Why time is the motion? It’s very simple. We can convince ourselves about it by means of two ways:

1. Similarly as:

– temperature is measured with temperature

– pressure is measured with pressure

– length is measured with length

– time is measured with motion, and as it is the same, motion is measured with time.

There is no such a possibility to express time (motion) in any other way, substituting its synonyms by any other meaning. If it would be possible, it could mean that time might be something else, appearing spontaneously in nature, but this is impossible. There is no proof that it has been confirmed.

2. We can carry out the following thought experiment:

Let’s admit that there is a sorcerer having the might to freeze the universe in a such way that all motion stops. Would it be then possible to measure time between any bodies? The answer is obvious. No motion = no time.

Summing up, time similarly as motion, change exists along with matter, with which is indissolubly connected (more on time in my article http://www.eioba.com/a/33e7/why-time-cannot-dilate). Obviously coining a word „matter-time” doesn’t make any sense. Now when we realize what time is, we are in position to set to proper description of surrounding reality. I dare say that all experiments aiming at confirmation of the alleged dilation of time are false in spite of calculation exactness of corrections to clock readings. Time is a matter of a concrete case and once acknowledged unit of its measure cannot be changing. Mixing up a chronometer with time was its false interpretation, among other things during experiment with caesium clocks. They were identified with time being just devices, or physical bodies in the above experiment and likewise any physical body reacted on change of physical conditions. There is no need to discuss all numerous experiments allegedly confirming so-called, alleged, dilation of time. They are not proved in macro-scale and they will also be false in micro-scale, e.g. observation of prolonged life of muons. „…the results that had been carried out yet in 1941, revealed the following. First, muons are created at any altitude, and thus also close to the Earth’s surface. Secondly, muons live longer not because, as stated by Einstein’s theory, the time of their life becomes longer, but because due to their high-speed they not so often collide with other particles.” Source: http://nasa_ktp.republika.pl/Requiem_uk.html . Now, there might appear a question what motion is, because such an idea exists separately to time. In my definition of motion, which is a roundabout, synonymous and tautological definition of time: „motion is changing of anything’s position in relation to anything”, also: „motion is changing position of any form of matter in relation to any form of matter”. All these definitions are aiming at giving a proper interpretation of the events where time is involved. In these cases we have to get over the synonyms of time involved in description of ideas, because there seem no simpler and clearer explanations to be found. From comprehension of time as above described, there appears that there is not possible dilation of time, because there is not possible to dilate motion, which is a function of velocity of a body. Consequently, velocity is a sequence of distance changes of anything in relation to anything (also, of any form of matter in relation to any form of matter). Let’s analyse the famous thought experiment with the observer:

t₁ – factual time

t₂ – allegededly dilated time

Assumption: t₂ > t₁

Factual event:   t₁ = s₁ / v₁

Event observed: t₂ = s₁ / v₁

As it results from the above set of equations t₁ = t₂ and this is in contradiction to the assumption, and means, dilation of time doesn’t appear.

There is no relativity of time, because neither displacement of a body, nor its speed depend on observer’s location. Time (of something) is always real.

Time travel is impossible, because there is no possibility of travelling in motion. You cannot eat the egg from which the chick is hatched, and you cannot eat the egg today that the hen will lay tomorrow.

Arrow of time does not exist as there is no one direction of motion of matter. We can take into consideration direction of motion of a concrete body only, but not one motion in general, as such does not exists.

Space-time doesn’t exist, because motion cannot be coupled with space. If we want to take into consideration motion, we must indicate anything that is moving. Motion or time cannot „inhabit” space, because it spontaneously does not exist.

The fourth time dimension does not exist, because motion of any body means that the said body is „forced” to take any amongst three dimensions and that means moving „upward – downward”; „to the right – to the left”; „forward – backward” needs time. By the way, where we should look for time dimension e.g. in a sugar cube?

II. MATTER

About matter generally we know everything what contemporary physics has given us on the plate, but there is a question to discuss. The point is in magnetic field. Everyone knows the way the magnetic field manifests. The question is: What is magnetic field indeed? It’s definitely not a spatial property. Space is landlord and magnetic field is one of its tenants. I consider that magnetic field belongs to micro-forms of matter. The problem is that there is not such a tool in possession of contemporary physics to enter such a subtlety of the micro-world. Would it be enough to examine forms of matter of a range 10^-30 m of length? Nobody knows, but this is the scale we should take into consideration. Matter’s attribute is a constant motion. Matter was created from primordial ether of primordial space. Quantum Mechanics describing micro-world by means of Relativity must definitely be false. There should be applied other solutions to examine this unattainable by science world. In physics everything is explicable, but humanity is not ready yet to face this challenge and reveal all mysteries of nature. There is one physics and its division for Newtonian and Relativistic is wrong.

III. ETHER

Primordial ether, the basic component of the material world, was, and is contained in primordial three dimensional space. Ether is filling up entire universe. The materialized part of the universe was created from primordial cosmc medium or so-called ether. For the time being we can only speculate on this final, unattainable by science link of nature that led to development of the highest organized form of matter ever known, which is human being. Ether constitutes the counterbalance to the materialized part of the universe. In view of the above, no particle can be elementary, as all forms of matter consist of the same, basic building block, or ether.

IV. SPACE

Primordial, three-dimensional, etheric space, constitutes finite volume of the universe. Without space nothing could exist. The volume of the universal space probably doesn’t undergo any changes, but its state of energy and matter undergoes constant ones. Omnipresent space is indestructible, doesn’t undergo any strain. So-called gravitational lensing is nothing else but curvature of its contents. Material part of the universe is balanced by the volume of the etheric space. Its subatomic structure (assuming it exists) is unknown, and as long as science doesn’t give answer on build-up of space, the existence of ether must not be excluded. Space cannot be coupled with time. Its attribute is energy. Beyond space is dimensionless nothingness. There is no transitional state of space with its frontier with dimensionless nothingness, as there no exist half-space, quarter-space or any fraction of it. Relativity of space is impossible once falseness of relativity of time was proved. In order to experience how we can imagine shape of space, it’s sufficient to approach to the immobilized magnet the other one, with the same pole. Trying to couple the both magnets, the approaching one we hold is repelled towards sides of the immobilized one. There appears very strong resistance and we can feel the ideal hemispheric shape of the space between them. Of course we don’t need to expect the same effect on the outskirts of the universe. Analogy can be made to the last layer of molecules in Earth’s atmosphere, which borders with the vacuum of space, which seems not to contain anything.

V. UNIVERSE

– The universe is finite. According to my speculative calculations, diameter of the universe should be minimum 6.2 x 10¹¹⁷ light years. So, such an unimaginable volume of energetic space would be necessary to balance material part of the universe. Let’s take radius of the observable part of the universe around 46 billion of light years, mass of the universe amounting to 3.35 x 10⁵⁷ g and mass of photon equal 4 x 10^-48 g. Calculation is carried out on the basis of the following proportions: 4.6 x 10¹⁰ : 4 x 10^-48= x : 3.35 x 10⁵⁷. Result is approximately 6.2 x 10¹¹⁶. We may speculate that there is a lighter fundamental brick of nature, hence the final result figures out minimum 6.2 x 10¹¹⁷ light years. If the materialized part of the universe spreads further then we can reach it with our observations, it probably resembles roughly a globular cluster, e.g. M13 in Hercules. The difference in similarity between galaxy and such a form of the universe (putting aside their structure) consists on lack of possibility to see small universes (I call such formations „small universes” – further „smallverses” due to lack of appropriate onomastics, nevertheless such a word has already been coined), because of distances between them exceeding feasibility of reaching each other by light. Thus we cannot exclude the likeliness, that there are more clusters resembling our universal bubble, due to some irregularities in the average appearance of the universe, to which belong: the Great Attractor, the Sloan Great Wall, or the Great Void. In order we could say something about appearance of the universe we should make first a trip for at least 40 billion of light years in any direction. I’d like to stress that the universe is obviously one thing and its name refers to its entirety.

– Beyond the universe nothing exists. That means there is no space beyond it.

– The univers spreads farther than we can penetrate it, but is finite.

– The universe doesn’t expand. According to some sources (e.g. of Pinopa), the observed accelerations of astronomical objects give us information from before billions of years and in comparatively not too far heavenly bodies shifting of their spectral lines is not observed any more.

– The universal nucleus (i.e. materialized part of the universe) must rotate. Big clusters of matter rotate around larger masses, as such are the laws of physics. We cannot observe its rotation because we are far off its axis.

– The materialised part of the universe was delivered by primordial, etheric space, and not by its singularity state as nothing could exist without space. Moreover, there is no rational explanation of forces that were able to compress the matter to such a microscopic point. The materialized part of the universe was born from an accidental condensation of primordial ether, that mass of which started to rotate and complicate their forms. The condensed ether of space initiated an avalanching creation of the simplest particles, which started to combine with themselves leading to creation of the most simple element, hydrogen. There were created numberless, gigantic whirling hydrogen clouds of the mass approximately equal to the present-day universe, leading to further evolution of various forms of matter.

– The axis of the universe goes through its biggest masses and is not a fixed one.

–  Galaxies, their clusters and other heavenly bodies will bump, concentrate and explode without the possibility of winding-up as one object. The universe will probably exist for ever, undergoing evolutionary changes. Return to the initial state (decomposition of matter) could be possible if motion of all forms of matter stopped and inside them as well, which is rather improbable.

The above description of the universe presents my own view with which nobody has to agree. I am fully aware that this description doesn’t give answer to endless questions involved, but if true, sets the course in proper direction for investigations of the universe.

Andrzej Lechowski