Could we say that NOTHING was since ever? Does it make any sense?
And now:
If statement that NOTHING was since ever (infinitely long) make sense, so the statement that SOMETHING was since ever is equally true.
Nevertheless, my reasoning is as follows:
There “Was-Is-Will_be” some STATE. Notion “State” is to be understood as SOMETHING or NOTHING (nowadays defined as the universe), because some STATE must be! Only man use differentiation of motion of something that was, is or will be performed. But time means changes. And what was when there weren’t any changes? There was just a certain state. There might be asked a question: How did this state start? Well, it didn’t start. It simply is! If we have a glimpse for some monument, so we are unable to distinguish any difference between its past, present and future, because these states are merged (at least seemingly). This is a certain analogy to a physical STATE. Actuation of time in the idea perceived by man, as a result of birth of matter, provokes an illusion that either something must have its beginning, or something lasts indefinitely long. If we say that “infinitely long”, we automately use the notion of time, which had not been born yet, and start to apply measure of time, whereas notion of time loses its sense. If it wouldn’t lose it, that could mean, the state never could start, as infinity cannot have its beginning.
Conclusion: NOTHING/SOMETHING “Was-Is-Will_be” = STATE. Well, in my point of view the beginning can have time/motion of something, that started to spin (rotate). It’s a feature of the universe, that everything is rotating around something. The STATE therefore underwent a change by something that initiated the birth of time.
Zastrzeżenie:
Linki prowadzące do stron autorów są przedmiotem oceny zainteresowanych czytelników, gdyż nie jestem w stanie ocenić zawartego w nich materiału, który oczywiście może okazać się częściowo lub w całości fałszywy. Tym nie mniej prace te mogą znacznie przyczynić się do znalezienia nowych dróg naukowych badań, odkryć lub rozwiązań.
Linki prowadzące do stron autorów są przedmiotem oceny zainteresowanych czytelników, gdyż nie jestem w stanie ocenić zawartego w nich materiału, który oczywiście może okazać się częściowo lub w całości fałszywy. Tym nie mniej prace te mogą znacznie przyczynić się do znalezienia nowych dróg naukowych badań, odkryć lub rozwiązań.
Disclaimer:
The links leading to the pages of their authors are to be evaluated by the interested readers, as I am not able to appraise the material contained therein, which obviously could turn out false in some parts or entirely. Nevertheless, these works could significantly contribute to finding of new ways of scientific investigations, discoveries or solutions.
The links leading to the pages of their authors are to be evaluated by the interested readers, as I am not able to appraise the material contained therein, which obviously could turn out false in some parts or entirely. Nevertheless, these works could significantly contribute to finding of new ways of scientific investigations, discoveries or solutions.
4 responses to “State”
-
Thanks for sharing your info. I truly appreciate your efforts and
I will be waiting for your further write ups thanks once again. -
At this time it appears like Drupal is the preferred
blogging platform available right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog? -
Dieting will be the nastiest word inside the world of, well,
dieting. Because there is absolutely no scientific
proof that it’ll help burn off your fat, you will need to be the judge of if
the thing is any actual advantages of employing this natural and organic
remedy. Balanced list eating is just not a great deal a diet since it is cook way
of eating. -
What’s up mates, good paragraph and nice arguments commented at this place, I am in fact enjoying by these.
Leave a Reply